The role of self-reported impulsivity and reward sensitivity versus neurocognitive measures of disinhibition and decision-making in the prediction of relapse in pathological gamblers
- 14 May 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Psychological Medicine
- Vol. 38 (1), 41-50
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291707000694
Abstract
Background: Disinhibition and decision-making skills play an important role in theories on the cause and outcome of addictive behaviors such as substance use disorders and pathological gambling. In recent studies, both disinhibition and disadvantageous decision-making strategies, as measured by neurocognitive tests, have been found to influence the course of substance use disorders. Research on factors affecting relapse in pathological gambling is scarce.Method: This study investigated the effect of both self-reported impulsivity and reward sensitivity, and neurocognitively assessed disinhibition and decision-making under conflicting contingencies, on relapse in a group of 46 pathological gamblers.Results: Logistic regression analysis indicated that longer duration of the disorder and neurocognitive indicators of disinhibition (Stop Signal Reaction Time) and decision-making (Card Playing Task) were significant predictors of relapse (explaining 53% of the variance in relapse), whereas self-reported impulsivity and reward sensitivity did not significantly predict relapse. Overall classification accuracy was 76%, with a positive classification accuracy of 76% and a negative classification accuracy of 75%.Conclusions: Duration of the disorder and neurocognitive measures of disinhibition and decision-making are powerful predictors of relapse in pathological gambling. The results suggest that endophenotypical neurocognitive characteristics are more promising in the prediction of relapse in pathological gambling than phenotypical personality characteristics. Neurocognitive predictors may be useful to guide treatment planning of follow-up contacts and booster sessions.Keywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pathological Gambling: Focusing on the Addiction, Not the ActivityAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2006
- Decision making in pathological gambling: A comparison between pathological gamblers, alcohol dependents, persons with Tourette syndrome, and normal controlsCognitive Brain Research, 2005
- Patient?treatment matching with anti?craving medications in alcohol?dependent patients: A review on phenotypic, endophenotypic and genetic indicatorsJournal of Substance Use, 2005
- Reward mechanisms in the brain and their role in dependence: evidence from neurophysiological and neuroimaging studiesBrain Research Reviews, 2001
- Predicting Relapse to Alcohol and Drug Abuse via Quantitative ElectroencephalographyNeuropsychopharmacology, 2001
- Factor structure of the barratt impulsiveness scaleJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1995
- Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortexCognition, 1994
- Randomized controlled trial in alcohol relapse prevention: Role of atenolol, alcohol craving, and treatment adherenceJournal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 1994
- A comparison of relapsed and non‐relapsed abstinent pathological gamblers following behavioural treatmentBritish Journal of Addiction, 1991
- The Dependence Syndrome Concept as a Psychological Theory of Relapse Behaviour: an empirical evaluation of alcoholic and opiate addictsBritish Journal of Addiction, 1987