Environmental Activism and Moral Schemas
- 11 October 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Behavior
- Vol. 45 (3), 399-423
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511422445
Abstract
Why do some people, but not others, participate in environmental activism? This article considers a potentially powerful yet underresearched explanation: variation in moral schemas. Drawing on Durkheim’s theory about the role of sacredness in moral decision making, the article classifies respondents into three mutually exclusive groups: unenchanted, who do not believe nature is sacred; intrinsic, who believe that nature is sacred in itself; and creational, who believe nature is sacred because it is a divine creation. Group membership predicts environmental activism using the 2000 General Social Survey. Individuals holding an intrinsic schema are more likely than other groups to sign an environmental petition and participate in an environmental group. Individuals holding an intrinsic or creational schema are more likely to donate money to environmental causes, relative to the unenchanted. Findings are robust, controlling for religious tradition, education, and various predictors of biographical availability. Both sacredness and its source matter for proenvironmental behavior.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Culture and Embodied Cognition: Moral Discourses in Internet Support Groups for OvereatersSocial Forces, 2009
- The Effect of Empathy in Environmental Moral ReasoningEnvironment and Behavior, 2008
- Socrates, Skinner, and Aristotle: Three Ways of Thinking About Culture in Action1Sociological Forum, 2008
- Framing the Issue: Religion, Secular Ethics and the Case of Animal Rights MobilizationSocial Forces, 2006
- Cultural Models of Nature and SocietyEnvironment and Behavior, 2006
- Spatial Measurement, Geography, and Urban Racial InequalitySocial Forces, 2003
- The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the ArtSocial Forces, 2000
- Social Structural and Social Psychological Bases of Environmental ConcernEnvironment and Behavior, 1998
- The Cognitive Structure of a Moral Crusade: Conservative Protestantism and Opposition to PornographySocial Forces, 1997
- The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: Have They Changed Over Time?1Rural Sociology, 1992