Reliability and Sensitivity of Visual Scales versus Volumetry for Evaluating White Matter Hyperintensity Progression
- 24 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Cerebrovascular Diseases
- Vol. 25 (3), 247-253
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000113863
Abstract
Background: Investigating associations between the change of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and clinical symptoms over time is crucial for establishing a causal relationship. However, the most suitable method for measuring WMH progression has not been established yet. We compared the reliability and sensitivity of cross-sectional and longitudinal visual scales with volumetry for measuring WMH progression. Methods: Twenty MRI scan pairs (interval 2 years) were included from the Amsterdam center of the LADIS study. Semi-automated volumetry of WMH was performed twice by one rater. Three cross-sectional scales (Fazekas Scale, Age-Related White Matter Changes Scale, Scheltens Scale) and two progression scales (Rotterdam Progression Scale, Schmidt Progression Scale) were scored by 4 and repeated by 2 raters. Results: Mean WMH volume (24.6 ± 27.9 ml at baseline) increased by 4.6 ± 5.1 ml [median volume change (range) = 2.7 (–0.6 to 15.7) ml]. Measuring volumetric change in WMH was reliable (intraobserver:intraclass coefficient = 0.88). All visual scales showed significant change of WMH over time, although the sensitivity was highest for both of the progression scales. Proportional volumetric change of WMH correlated best with the Rotterdam Progression Scale (Spearman’s r = 0.80, p < 0.001) and the Schmidt Progression Scale (Spearman’s r = 0.64, p < 0.01). Although all scales were reliable for assessment of WMH cross-sectionally, WMH progression assessment using visual scales was less reliable, except for the Rotterdam Progression scale which had moderate to good reliability [weighted Cohen’s ĸ = 0.63 (intraobserver), 0.59 (interobserver)]. Conclusion: To determine change in WMH, dedicated progression scales are more sensitive and/or reliable and correlate better with volumetric volume change than cross-sectional scales.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Age, Hypertension, and Lacunar Stroke Are the Major Determinants of the Severity of Age-Related White Matter ChangesCerebrovascular Diseases, 2006
- Impact of White Matter Hyperintensities Scoring Method on Correlations With Clinical DataStroke, 2006
- Fully automatic segmentation of white matter hyperintensities in MR images of the elderlyNeuroImage, 2005
- White matter hyperintensities and depression—preliminary results from the LADIS studyInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2005
- Impact of Age-Related Cerebral White Matter Changes on the Transition to Disability – The LADIS Study: Rationale, Design and MethodologyNeuroepidemiology, 2004
- The analysis of repeated ‘direct’ measures of change illustrated with an application in longitudinal imagingStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- Visual Rating of Age-Related White Matter Changes on Magnetic Resonance ImagingStroke, 2003
- A New Rating Scale for Age-Related White Matter Changes Applicable to MRI and CTStroke, 2001
- Estimation of Effect Size from a Series of Experiments Involving Paired ComparisonsJournal of Educational Statistics, 1993
- A semiquantative rating scale for the assessment of signal hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imagingJournal of the Neurological Sciences, 1993