Effect of Nonoptimal Imaging on the Relationship Between the Measured Degree of Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Risk of Ischemic Stroke
Open Access
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Stroke
- Vol. 37 (7), 1785-1791
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000227231.85653.ea
Abstract
Background and Purpose— Some recent studies of noninvasive carotid imaging have identified high rates of inappropriate decision-making about endarterectomy compared with conventional arterial angiography (CAA), but there is substantial inconsistency across the published literature. CAA is usually regarded as the gold standard for carotid imaging, partly because the degree of angiographic stenosis is a powerful predictor of ischemic stroke and hence of benefit from endarterectomy. However, there are very few published data on the extent to which predictive power varies with type of CAA or the number and quality of views of the stenosis obtained. Methods— We analyzed measurements of stenosis made by 2 independent observers on 967 consecutive patients randomized to medial treatment alone in the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). We determined prediction of 3-year risk of ipsilateral ischemic stroke (as a hazard ratio from a Cox model and as the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]) in relation to the technique of angiography, the number and quality of views of the stenosis, and the use of 2 independent measurements. Results— Using 2 independent measurements of stenosis increased predictive power slightly, but the effect was much smaller than that attributable to the type of CAA and the number of views of the stenosis. Prognostic value was greater in patients who had selective carotid injection CAA and at least biplane views (AUC, 0.75; 0.68 to 0.82) than in patients with only a single view or aortic arch injection CAA (AUC, 0.65; 0.56 to 0.73; P =0.03). Conclusions— The dependence of the prognostic value of CAA on the type of angiography and the number of views of the stenosis obtained has implications for the future development and validation of noninvasive methods of carotid imaging.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sensitivity and specificity of color duplex ultrasound measurement in the estimation of internal carotid artery stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysisJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2005
- For Severe Carotid Stenosis Found on Ultrasound, Further Arterial Evaluation Prior to Carotid Endarterectomy Is Unnecessary: The Argument AgainstStroke, 2003
- Incidence and Outcome of Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms in a Defined PopulationStroke, 2003
- Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosisThe Lancet, 2003
- Low rate of complications of cerebral angiography in routine clinical practiceNeurology, 2001
- Noninvasive carotid imaging to select patients for endarterectomyNeurology, 2001
- Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision makingNeurology, 2001
- Benefit of Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Symptomatic Moderate or Severe StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST)The Lancet, 1998
- Preoperative Testing before Carotid Endarterectomy: A Survey of Vascular Surgeons' AttitudesAnnals of Vascular Surgery, 1997