Still Waiting for Godot? Improving Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES) to Enable More Evidence-Based Nutrition Policies
Open Access
- 15 September 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Food and Nutrition Bulletin
- Vol. 33 (3_suppl2), S242-S251
- https://doi.org/10.1177/15648265120333s214
Abstract
The constrained evidence base of food and nutrition policy-making compromises nutrition programs. Nutrition policy-making must do better than relying exclusively on Food and Agriculture Organization Food Balance Sheets. The strategy of relying on observed-weighed food record or 24-hour recall surveys has not proven practical either; they remain few in number, generally not nationally representative, and of dubious external validity. Although Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES) have shortcomings, they are increasingly being used to address this information gap. To promote dialog within the nutrition community, and between it and the greater community of HCES stakeholders, in order to identify their shared agenda and develop a strategy to improve HCES for analyzing food and nutrition issues. The diverse origins and objectives of HCES are described, the evolution of their use in addressing food and nutrition issues is traced, and their shortcomings are identified. The causes, relative importance, some potential solutions, and the strategic implications of three distinct categories of shortcomings are discussed. Elements of a possible approach and process for strengthening the surveys are outlined, including identifying best practices, developing guidelines and more rigorously analyzing the tradeoffs involved in common, key survey design and implementation decisions. To date, the nutrition community's role in most HCES has been as a passive user of secondary data. The nutrition community must become more involved in the design, implementation, and analysis of HCES by identifying criteria for prioritizing countries, establishing assessment criteria, applying the criteria in retrospective assessments, identifying key shortcomings, and recommending alternatives to ameliorate the short-comings. Several trends suggest that this is a propitious time for improving the relevance and reliability of HCES.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES): A Primer for Food and Nutrition Analysts in Low- and Middle-Income CountriesFood and Nutrition Bulletin, 2012
- Comparison of Estimates of the Nutrient Density of the Diet of Women and Children in Uganda by Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES) and 24-Hour RecallFood and Nutrition Bulletin, 2012
- Using Household Consumption and Expenditures Survey (HCES) Data to Assess Dietary Intake in Relation to the Nutrition Transition: A Case Study from Cape VerdeFood and Nutrition Bulletin, 2012
- Developing Simple Measures of Women’s Diet Quality in Developing Countries: Overview ,Journal of Nutrition, 2010
- How Cost-Effective is Biofortification in Combating Micronutrient Malnutrition? An Ex ante AssessmentWorld Development, 2009
- Potential impacts of iron biofortification in IndiaSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2008
- Genetic Engineering for the Poor: Golden Rice and Public Health in IndiaWorld Development, 2008
- Estimations of daily energy and nutrient availability based on nationally representative household budget survey data. The Data Food Networking (DAFNE) projectPublic Health Nutrition, 2007
- Plant breeding to control zinc deficiency in India: how cost-effective is biofortification?Public Health Nutrition, 2007
- Family food purchases and home food consumption: comparison of nutrient contentsBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1985