Transparency in Research involving Animals: The Basel Declaration and new principles for reporting research in BJP manuscripts
- 21 April 2015
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Pharmacology
- Vol. 172 (10), 2427-2432
- https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.12956
Abstract
This article discusses the background to the need for change in the reporting of experiments involving animals, including a report of a consensus meeting organised by the Basel Declaration Society and Understanding Animal Research UK that sought to Internationalise guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals. A commentary on the evolution of BJP's attempts to implement the ARRIVE guidelines and details of our new guidance for authors is published separately (McGrath, 2014). This is one of a series of editorials discussing updates to the BJP Instructions to Authors LINKED EDITORIALS: This Editorial is the first in a series. The other Editorials in this series will be published in the forthcoming issues. To view them, visit: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1476-5381.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implementing guidelines on reporting research using animals (ARRIVE etc.): new requirements for publication in BJPBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 2015
- The Rat Genome Database 2015: genomic, phenotypic and environmental variations and diseaseNucleic Acids Research, 2014
- How predictive and productive is animal research?BMJ, 2014
- Announcement: Reducing our irreproducibilityNature, 2013
- Improving planning, design, reporting and scientific quality of animal experiments by using the Gold Standard Publication Checklist, in addition to the ARRIVE guidelinesBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 2011
- Guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals: the ARRIVE guidelinesBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 2010
- Animal research: Reporting in vivo experiments: The ARRIVE guidelinesBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 2010