V1 is not uniquely identified by polarity reversals of responses to upper and lower visual field stimuli
- 1 October 2010
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in NeuroImage
- Vol. 52 (4), 1401-1409
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.016
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- EY06579
- EY018875-01S109
- EY006883-24
- C.V. Starr
- Research to Prevent Blindness Walt and Lilly Disney Award for Amblyopia Research
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- The folding fingerprint of visual cortex reveals the timing of human V1 and V2NeuroImage, 2010
- Investigating spatial specificity and data averaging in MEGNeuroImage, 2010
- Does Retinotopy Influence Cortical Folding in Primate Visual Cortex?Journal of Neuroscience, 2009
- Evaluation of hierarchical Bayesian method through retinotopic brain activities reconstruction from fMRI and MEG signalsNeuroImage, 2008
- Source estimates for MEG/EEG visual evoked responses constrained by multiple, retinotopically‐mapped stimulus locationsHuman Brain Mapping, 2008
- The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: Comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortexNeuroImage, 2007
- Spatial resolution of EEG cortical source imaging revealed by localization of retinotopic organization in human primary visual cortexJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 2007
- Functional measurements of human ventral occipital cortex: retinotopy and colourPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2002
- Cortical Surface-Based Analysis: I. Segmentation and Surface ReconstructionNeuroImage, 1999
- Source model and scalp topography of pattern reversal visual evoked potentials to altitudinal stimuli suggest that infoldings of calcarine fissure are not part of VEP generatorsBrain Topography, 1995