How Does Body Fat Influence Bone Mass in Childhood? A Mendelian Randomization Approach
Open Access
- 1 March 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 24 (3), 522-533
- https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.081109
Abstract
Fat mass may be a causal determinant of bone mass, but the evidence is conflicting, possibly reflecting the influence of confounding factors. The recent identification of common genetic variants related to obesity in children provides an opportunity to implement a Mendelian randomization study of obesity and bone outcomes, which is less subject to confounding and several biases than conventional approaches. Genotyping was retrieved for variants of two loci reliably associated with adiposity (the fat mass and obesity-related gene FTO and that upstream of the MC4R locus) within 7470 children from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) who had undergone total body DXA scans at a mean of 9.9 yr. Relationships between both fat mass/genotypes and bone measures were assessed in efforts to determine evidence of causality between adiposity and bone mass. In conventional tests of association, both with and without height adjustment, total fat mass was strongly related to total body, spinal, and upper and lower limb BMC (ratio of geometric means [RGM]: 1.118 [95% CI: 1.112, 1.123], 1.110 [95% CI: 1.102, 1.119], 1.101 [95% CI: 1.093, 1.108], 1.146 [95% CI: 1.143, 1.155]; p < 10−10 [adjusted for sex, height, and sitting height]). Equivalent or larger effects were obtained from instrumental variable (IV) regression including the same covariates (1.139 [95% CI: 1.064, 1.220], 1.090 [95% CI: 1.010, 1.177], 1.142 [95% CI: 1.049, 1.243], 1.176 [95% CI: 1.099, 1.257]; p = 0.0002, 0.03, 0.002, and 2.3−6 respectively). Similar results were obtained after adjusting for puberty, when truncal fat mass was used in place of total fat, and when bone area was used instead of bone mass. In analyses where total body BMC adjusted for bone area (BA) was the outcome (reflecting volumetric BMD), linear regression with fat mass showed evidence for association (1.004 [95% CI: 1.002, 1.007], p = 0.0001). IV regression also showed a positive effect (1.031 [95% CI: 1.000, 1.062], p = 0.05). When MC4R and FTO markers were used as instruments for fat mass, similar associations with BMC were seen to those with fat mass as measured by DXA. This suggests that fat mass is on the causal pathway for bone mass in children. In addition, both directly assessed and IV-assessed relationships between fat mass and volumetric density showed evidence for positive effects, supporting a hypothesis that fat effects on bone mass are not entirely accounted for by association with overall bone size.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Common variants near MC4R are associated with fat mass, weight and risk of obesityNature Genetics, 2008
- Osteocalcin differentially regulates β cell and adipocyte gene expression and affects the development of metabolic diseases in wild-type miceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- Correlation of Obesity and Osteoporosis: Effect of Fat Mass on the Determination of OsteoporosisJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2008
- Relationships between fat and boneOsteoporosis International, 2007
- A Common Variant in the FTO Gene Is Associated with Body Mass Index and Predisposes to Childhood and Adult ObesityScience, 2007
- Adipose Tissue Stimulates Bone Growth in Prepubertal ChildrenJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2006
- Social Position Affects Bone Mass in Childhood Through Opposing Actions on Height and WeightJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2005
- Free Testosterone Is a Positive, Whereas Free Estradiol Is a Negative, Predictor of Cortical Bone Size in Young Swedish Men: The GOOD StudyJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2005
- A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of MomentsJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2002
- Height and weight at menarche and a hypothesis of menarcheArchives of Disease in Childhood, 1971