Involving a Citizens’ Jury in Decisions on Individual Screening for Prostate Cancer
Open Access
- 11 January 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 11 (1), e0143176
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143176
Abstract
Most public health agencies and learned societies agree that the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test in asymptomatic men should not be recommended, on account of its potential for harm. Yet PSA is still widely used as a screening test and is not being abandoned. This remains a significant public health issue, and citizens’ engagement is needed. This study was designed to produce a deliberation on the PSA screening test by a citizens’ jury. Fifteen citizens were selected and balanced for sex, age, and education. They received an information booklet and participated in a two-day meeting with experts to reach a deliberation on the question “Should the National Health Service discourage or recommend PSA as an individual screening test for prostate cancer in men 55–69 years old?”. A facilitator ran the jurors’ discussion. All except three of the jurors decided that the National Health Service should discourage the use of PSA as an individual screening test for prostate cancer in 55–69 year-old men. The jury was particularly convinced by the uncertainty of the test outcomes, the utility of the test, and its cost/benefit ratio. Before the meeting 60% of jurors would have recommended the test to a relative, and all the male jurors would have done so. After the meeting these percentages fell to 15% and 12%. This experience confirms the feasibility and effectiveness of delegating to a group of citizens the responsibility to decide on public health issues on behalf of the community. Public health authorities should invest in information campaigns aimed at the public and in educational initiatives for physicians. This also provided an opportunity to disseminate information on screening, over-diagnosis, and over-treatment.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating the use of citizens’ juries in food policy: a case study of food regulationBMC Public Health, 2013
- Screening for prostate cancerCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013
- Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task ForceAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- Opportunistic prostate-specific antigen screening in Italy: 6 years of monitoring from the Italian general practice databaseEuropean Journal Of Cancer Prevention, 2010
- My health: whose responsibility? A jury decidesJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2009
- Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European StudyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: The role of citizens’ deliberationHealth Policy, 2007
- PartecipaSalute, an Italian project to involve lay people, patients’ associations and scientific‐medical representatives in the health debateHealth Expectations, 2007
- Screening for prostate cancerCurrent Opinion in Urology, 1993