Evaluation of Neuromotor Function in Infancy–A Systematic Review of Available Methods
- 1 August 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
- Vol. 29 (4), 315-323
- https://doi.org/10.1097/dbp.0b013e318182a4ea
Abstract
Neuromotor function in infancy can be evaluated in various ways. Assessment instruments are used for early detection of children with a high risk for developmental disorders. Early detection enables clinicians to provide intervention at a young age when plasticity of the nervous system is high. The assessments may also be used to monitor intervention. The present article will review the psychometric properties of methods to assess neuromotor function in infancy. A literature search was performed in PubMed, Medline, and PsycINFO (1966–2007) on instruments to assess neuromotor functioning of infants. Fifteen instruments were included and classified into 4 groups: (1) Comprehensive neurological examinations (n = 4). These techniques are widely used, though little is known about their reliability. Their validity in predicting major developmental disorders such as cerebral palsy is good; their predictive validity for minor motor disorders is moderate at best. (2) Procedures with standardized scoring (n = 7). These have good reliability, but only moderate predictive validity for major developmental disorders. No data available for prediction of minor developmental disorders. (3) Observation of milestones (n = 2). Its predictive validity for major developmental disorders is only moderate, whereas reliability is good. (4) Assessment of quality of motor behavior or motor patterns (n = 2). These instruments have the best predictive validity for major and minor developmental motor disorders, but current methods are only useful under the age of 4 months. Prediction of developmental outcome at an early age is difficult. In medical evaluations of high-risk infants, the best predictions are achieved through a combination of multiple, complementary tools, that is, achieved milestones, neurological examination and assessment of the quality of motor behavior.Keywords
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Muscle power development in preterm infants with periventricular flaring or leukomalacia in relation to outcome at 18 monthsDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 2007
- Discriminating Infants From Different Developmental Outcome Groups Using the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) Item ResponsesPediatric Physical Therapy, 2007
- Comparison of Two Methods of Neurologic Assessment in InfantsPediatric Neurology, 2005
- Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for prediction of 6-, 9- and 12-month scores on the Alberta Infant Motor ScaleDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 2002
- Early motor development of premature infants with birthweight less than 2000 gramsActa Paediatrica, 2000
- Invalid measurement validityDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1999
- Comparison between observation of spontaneous movements and neurologic examination in preterm infantsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1997
- A Method to Assess the Development of Muscle Power in Preterms After Term AgeNeuropediatrics, 1992
- Item Reliability of the Movement Assessment of InfantsPhysical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics, 1986
- A methodological framework for assessing health indicesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1985