To Fish or Not to Fish: Factors at Multiple Scales Affecting Artisanal Fishers' Readiness to Exit a Declining Fishery
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 10 February 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 7 (2), e31460
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031460
Abstract
Globally, fisheries are challenged by the combined impacts of overfishing, degradation of ecosystems and impacts of climate change, while fisheries livelihoods are further pressured by conservation policy imperatives. Fishers' adaptive responses to these pressures, such as exiting from a fishery to pursue alternative livelihoods, determine their own vulnerability, as well as the potential for reducing fishing effort and sustaining fisheries. The willingness and ability to make particular adaptations in response to change, such as exiting from a declining fishery, is influenced by economic, cultural and institutional factors operating at scales from individual fishers to national economies. Previous studies of exit from fisheries at single or few sites, offer limited insight into the relative importance of individual and larger-scale social and economic factors. We asked 599 fishers how they would respond to hypothetical scenarios of catch declines in 28 sites in five western Indian Ocean countries. We investigated how socioeconomic variables at the individual-, household- and site-scale affected whether they would exit fisheries. Site-level factors had the greatest influence on readiness to exit, but these relationships were contrary to common predictions. Specifically, higher levels of infrastructure development and economic vitality - expected to promote exit from fisheries - were associated with less readiness to exit. This may be due to site level histories of exit from fisheries, greater specialisation of fishing households, or higher rewards from fishing in more economically developed sites due to technology, market access, catch value and government subsidies. At the individual and household scale, fishers from households with more livelihood activities, and fishers with lower catch value were more willing to exit. These results demonstrate empirically how adaptive responses to change are influenced by factors at multiple scales, and highlight the importance of understanding natural resource-based livelihoods in the context of the wider economy and society.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Critical thresholds and tangible targets for ecosystem-based management of coral reef fisheriesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- Economic and geographic drivers of wildlife consumption in rural AfricaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- Adaptive capacity and its assessmentGlobal Environmental Change, 2011
- Social identity, perception and motivation in adaptation to climate risk in the coffee sector of Chiapas, MexicoGlobal Environmental Change, 2011
- Livelihood Diversification in Tropical Coastal Communities: A Network-Based Approach to Analyzing ‘Livelihood Landscapes’PLOS ONE, 2010
- Middlemen, a critical social-ecological link in coastal communities of Kenya and ZanzibarMarine Policy, 2010
- Understanding social resilience to climate variability in primary enterprises and industriesGlobal Environmental Change, 2010
- Socioeconomic Factors that Affect Artisanal Fishers’ Readiness to Exit a Declining FisheryConservation Biology, 2009
- A Property Rights Approach to Understanding Human Displacement from Protected Areas: the Case of Marine Protected AreasConservation Biology, 2009
- The livelihoods approach and management of small-scale fisheriesMarine Policy, 2001