Migration of Intrauterine Devices: Radiologic Findings and Implications for Patient Care
- 1 March 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in RadioGraphics
- Vol. 32 (2), 335-352
- https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.322115068
Abstract
Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are a commonly used form of contraception worldwide. However, migration of the IUD from its normal position in the uterine fundus is a frequently encountered complication, varying from uterine expulsion to displacement into the endometrial canal to uterine perforation. Different sites of IUD translocation vary in terms of their clinical significance and subsequent management, and the urgency of communicating IUD migration to the clinician is likewise variable. Expulsion or intrauterine displacement of the IUD leads to decreased contraceptive efficacy and should be clearly communicated, since it warrants IUD replacement to prevent unplanned pregnancy. Embedment of the IUD into the myometrium can usually be managed in the outpatient clinical setting but occasionally requires hysteroscopic removal. Complete uterine perforation, in which the IUD is partially or completely within the peritoneal cavity, requires surgical management, and timely and direct communication with the clinician is essential in such cases. Careful evaluation for intraabdominal complications is also important, since they may warrant urgent or emergent surgical intervention. The radiologist plays an important role in the diagnosis of IUD migration and should be familiar with its appearance at multiple imaging modalities.This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does the Type of Intrauterine Device Affect Conspicuity on 2D and 3D Ultrasound?American Journal of Roentgenology, 2011
- Side effects from the copper IUD: do they decrease over time?Contraception, 2009
- Imaging of Intrauterine Contraceptive DevicesJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2007
- Copper-T intrauterine device and levonorgestrel intrauterine system: biological bases of their mechanism of actionContraception, 2007
- Copper T 380A IUD and magnetic resonance imagingContraception, 2007
- The mechanism of action of hormonal contraceptives and intrauterine contraceptive devicesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999
- Health during prolonged use of levonorgestrel 20μg/d and the Copper TCu 380Ag intrauterine contraceptive devices: a multicenter studyFertility and Sterility, 1994
- Role of ultrasonography in managing IUD-related complaintsContraception, 1992
- Randomized clinical trial with intrauterine devices (levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG), CuT 380Ag, CuT 220C and CuT 200B) A 36-month studyContraception, 1989
- Effectiveness of IUDs: A reviewContraception, 1987