Comparison of Referring and Final Pathology for Patients With Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- 1 November 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 26 (31), 5107-5112
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.16.4061
Abstract
Purpose: Before the implementation of the WHO lymphoma classification system, disagreement about pathologic diagnosis was common. We sought to estimate the impact of expert review in the modern era by comparing final pathologic diagnoses at five comprehensive cancer centers with diagnoses assigned at referring centers. Patients and Methods: Patients in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) database with a documented pathologic diagnosis before presentation and a final pathologic diagnosis of any of five common B-cell NHLs were eligible. After central review of discordant cases, we estimated the rate of pathologic concordance, then investigated the etiology of discordance as well its potential impact on prognosis and treatment. Results: The overall pathologic discordance rate was 6% (43 of 731 patients; 95% CI, 4% to 8%). For the majority of cases in which the referring diagnosis was apparently final, no additional studies were conducted at the NCCN center, and the change in diagnosis reflected a different interpretation of existing data. Concordance was highest for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (95%) and follicular lymphoma (FL; grades 1, 2, and not otherwise specified, 95%) and lowest for grade 3 FL (88%). Of the 43 pathologically discordant cases, 81% (35 patients) might have experienced a change in treatment as a result of the pathologic reclassification. Conclusion: In the era of the WHO lymphoma classification system, the majority of common B-cell NHLs diagnosed in the community were unchanged by second opinion review by an expert hematopathologist. However, for one patient in 20, there was a discordance in diagnosis that could have altered therapy.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pathology the Gold Standard – A Retrospective Analysis of Discordant “Second-Opinion” Lymphoma Pathology and Its Impact on Patient Care.Blood, 2006
- Lymphoma incidence patterns by WHO subtype in the United States, 1992-2001Blood, 2006
- The World Health Organization Classification of Neoplastic Diseases of the Hematopoietic and Lymphoid TissuesAnnals of Oncology, 1999
- A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Classification Project.1997
- A Clinical Evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group Classification of Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaBlood, 1997
- Evaluation of pathology review of malignant lymphomas and Hodgkin's disease in cooperative clinical trials: The eastern cooperative oncology group experienceCancer, 1988
- Use of the working formulation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in epidemiologic studies: agreement between reported diagnoses and a panel of experienced pathologists.1987
- Classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Reproducibility of major classification systemsCancer, 1985
- Reproducibility in Morphologic Classification of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas Using the Lukes–Collins System: The Southeastern Cancer Study Group ExperienceAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1984
- Eastern cooperative oncology group experience with the rappaport classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphomasCancer, 1979