Randomized Comparisons Between Different Stenting Approaches for Bifurcation Coronary Lesions With or Without Side Branch Stenosis
- 1 April 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 8 (4), 550-560
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.016
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Korean Society of Interventional Cardiology
- Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project
- Ministry of Health and Welfare
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contemporary Patterns of Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound Use Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data RegistryJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012
- 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary InterventionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2011
- Preintervention Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Predictors for Side Branch Compromise After a Single-Stent Crossover TechniqueThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2011
- Prospective Randomized Comparison of Sirolimus- or Everolimus-Eluting Stent to Treat Bifurcated Lesions by Provisional ApproachJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2011
- Simple or Complex Stenting for Bifurcation Coronary LesionsCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2011
- Randomized Trial of Simple Versus Complex Drug-Eluting Stenting for Bifurcation LesionsCirculation, 2010
- Randomized Comparison of Coronary Bifurcation Stenting With the Crush Versus the Culotte Technique Using Sirolimus Eluting StentsCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2009
- Long‐term outcomes of bifurcation lesions after implantation of drug‐eluting stents with the “mini‐crush technique”Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2007
- Treatment of bifurcation lesions with two stents: one year angiographic and clinical follow up of crush versus T stentingHeart, 2005
- Rapamycin-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions: A randomized comparison of a simple versus complex strategyAmerican Heart Journal, 2004