Equivalence of Electronic and Paper-and-Pencil Administration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Meta-Analytic Review
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Value in Health
- Vol. 11 (2), 322-333
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00231.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Touch-screen computer systems in the rheumatology clinic offer a reliable and user-friendly means of collecting quality-of-life and outcome data from patients with rheumatoid arthritisRheumatology, 2005
- Electronic pain diary: a randomized crossover studyJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2004
- Electronic pain questionnaires: A randomized, crossover comparison with paper questionnaires for chronic pain assessmentPain, 2004
- Assessment of patient‐reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health‐related quality of lifeFundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, 2004
- Factors Influencing the Use of Computer Technology in the Collection of Clinical Data in a Predominantly African‐American PopulationJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2002
- Computerized information‐gathering in specialist rheumatology clinics: an initial evaluation of an electronic version of the Short Form 36Rheumatology, 2002
- Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients.Psychological Methods, 1996
- Validation of a computerized version of the 10-item (self-rating) Edinburgh postnatal depression scaleJournal of Affective Disorders, 1991
- Measurement of health status: Ascertaining the minimal clinically important differenceControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of ReliabilityEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1973