Dietary intake and status of n–3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in a population of fish-eating and non-fish-eating meat-eaters, vegetarians, and vegans and the precursor-product ratio of α-linolenic acid to long-chain n–3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: results from the EPIC-Norfolk cohort
Open Access
- 1 November 2010
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 92 (5), 1040-1051
- https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2010.29457
Abstract
Background: Intakes of n–3 (omega-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are important for health. Because fish is the major source of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), non-fish-eaters may have suboptimal n–3 PUFA status, although the importance of the conversion of plant-derived α-linolenic acid (ALA) to EPA and DHA is debated. Objective: The objective was to determine intakes, food sources, and status of n–3 PUFAs according to dietary habit (fish-eaters and non-fish-eating meat-eaters, vegetarians, or vegans) and estimated conversion between dietary ALA and circulating long-chain n–3 PUFAs. Design: This study included 14,422 men and women aged 39–78 y from the EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition)-Norfolk cohort with 7-d diary data and a substudy in 4902 individuals with plasma phospholipid fatty acid measures. Intakes and status of n–3 PUFAs were measured, and the precursor-product ratio of ALA to circulating n–3 PUFAs was calculated. Results: Most of the dietary intake of EPA and DHA was supplied by fish; however, meat was the major source in meat-eaters, and spreading fats, soups, and sauces were the major sources in vegetarians. Total n–3 PUFA intakes were 57–80% lower in non-fish-eaters than in fish-eaters, but status differences were considerably smaller. The estimated precursor-product ratio was greater in women than in men and greater in non-fish-eaters than in fish-eaters. Conclusions: Substantial differences in intakes and in sources of n–3 PUFAs existed between the dietary-habit groups, but the differences in status were smaller than expected, possibly because the precursor-product ratio was greater in non-fish-eaters than in fish-eaters, potentially indicating increased estimated conversion of ALA. If intervention studies were to confirm these findings, it could have implications for fish requirements.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- α-Linolenic acid supplementation and conversion to n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in humansProstaglandins, Leukotrienes & Essential Fatty Acids, 2009
- Omega-3 Fatty Acids for CardioprotectionMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2008
- Should patients with cardiovascular disease take fish oil?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2008
- Cardiovascular risk and the omega-3 indexJournal of Cardiovascular Medicine, 2007
- Extremely limited synthesis of long chain polyunsaturates in adults: implications for their dietary essentiality and use as supplementsApplied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 2007
- A collaborative effort to apply the evidence-based review process to the field of nutrition: challenges, benefits, and lessons learnedThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2007
- Cardiovascular benefits of omega-3 fatty acidsCardiovascular Research, 2007
- Risks and benefits of omega 3 fats for mortality, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: systematic reviewBMJ, 2006
- Alpha-Linolenic AcidCirculation, 2005
- Achieving optimal essential fatty acid status in vegetarians: current knowledge and practical implicationsThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2003