Spatiotemporal Colonization of Xylella fastidiosa in its Vector Supports the Role of Egestion in the Inoculation Mechanism of Foregut-Borne Plant Pathogens
Open Access
- 1 August 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Scientific Societies in Phytopathology®
- Vol. 101 (8), 912-922
- https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-09-10-0231
Abstract
The pathogen that causes Pierce's disease of grapevine, Xylella fastidiosa, is the only known bacterial, arthropod-transmitted plant pathogen that does not circulate in the vector's hemolymph. Instead, bacteria are foregut-borne, persistent in adult vectors but semipersistent in immatures (i.e., bacteria colonize cuticular surfaces of the anterior foregut, are retained for hours to days, but are lost during molting). Yet, exactly how a sharpshooter vector inoculates bacteria from foregut acquisition sites is unknown. The present study used confocal laser-scanning microscopy to identify locations in undissected, anterior foreguts of the glassy-winged sharpshooter colonized by green fluorescent protein-expressing X. fastidiosa. Spatial and temporal distributions of colonizing X. fastidiosa were examined daily over acquisition access periods of 1 to 6 days for both contaminated field-collected and clean laboratory-reared Homalodisca vitripennis. Results provide the first direct, empirical evidence that established populations of X. fastidiosa can disappear from vector foreguts over time. When combined with existing knowledge on behavior, physiology, and functional anatomy of sharpshooter feeding, present results support the idea that the disappearance is caused by outward fluid flow (egestion) not inward flow (ingestion) (i.e., swallowing). Thus, results support the hypothesis that egestion is a critical part of the X. fastidiosa inoculation mechanism. Furthermore, results suggest a cyclical, spatiotemporal pattern of microbial colonization, disappearance, and recolonization in the precibarium. Colonization patterns also support two types of egestion, termed rinsing and discharging egestion herein. Finally, comparison of acquisition results for field-collected versus laboratory-reared sharpshooters suggest that there may be competitive binding for optimum acquisition sites in the foregut. Therefore, successful inoculation of X. fastidiosa may depend, in large part, on vector load in the precibarium.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimating Xylella fastidiosa transmission parameters: decoupling sharpshooter number and feeding periodEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2009
- Behavioural aspects influencing plant virus transmission by homopteran insectsVirus Research, 2009
- A protein key to plant virus transmission at the tip of the insect vector styletProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007
- Acquisition and Retention ofXylella fastidiosaby an Efficient Vector,Graphocephala atropunctataPhytopathology®, 1995
- Leafhopper Probing Behavior Associated with Maize Chlorotic Dwarf Virus Transmission to MaizePhytopathology®, 1993
- Cell membrane punctures during epidermal penetrations by aphids: consequences for the transmission of two potyvirusesAnnals of Applied Biology, 1991
- Leafhopper and Planthopper Transmission of Plant VirusesAnnual Review of Entomology, 1989
- The sensory systems and feeding behavior of leafhoppers. II. A comparison of the sensillar morphologies of several species (Homoptera: Cicadellidae)Journal of Morphology, 1983
- Colonization of the Sharpshooter Vectors,Oncometopia nigricansandHomalodisca coagulata,by Xylem-Limited BacteriaPhytopathology®, 1983
- The sensory systems and feeding behavior of leafhoppers. I. The aster leafhopper, Macrosteles fascifrons stål (homoptera, cicadellidae)Journal of Morphology, 1982