Detection of antibodies to deiminated recombinant rat filaggrin by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay: A highly effective test for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

Objective To assay antifilaggrin autoantibodies, we developed an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a “citrullinated” recombinant rat filaggrin. Our objectives were to assess its value for diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare the results with those obtained using 4 other reference methods for detection of antifilaggrin autoantibodies, including the commercially available ELISA that uses a modified “citrullinated” synthetic peptide derived from the sequence of human filaggrin (CCP‐ELISA). Methods We analyzed 711 sera from patients with well‐characterized rheumatic diseases, including 240 patients with RA. Antifilaggrin autoantibodies were detected by an ELISA using a recombinant rat filaggrin deiminated in vitro as immunosorbent (ArFA‐ELISA). The results considered were the differences between the optical densities obtained on deiminated and nondeiminated proteins. Antibodies to rat esophagus epithelium were detected by indirect immunofluorescence, while antibodies to human filaggrin were detected by immunoblotting and by a recently described ELISA using a deiminated recombinant human filaggrin. Finally, CCP‐ELISA was performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Results At the titer thresholds allowing diagnostic specificities of 0.95, 0.985, and 0.99 to be reached, the diagnostic sensitivities of the ArFA‐ELISA were 0.76, 0.67, and 0.65, respectively. At these 3 thresholds, the sensitivities were significantly higher than those of the 4 other tests. Despite incomplete overlapping of the 5 tests, the high diagnostic performance of the ArFA‐ELISA allows us to propose this test to replace all the other methods for antifilaggrin autoantibody detection. Conclusion ArFA‐ELISA appears to be the most efficient test among those available for the detection of antifilaggrin autoantibodies, in terms of diagnostic accuracy for RA. Its diagnostic performance in early RA and its prognostic value are currently under evaluation.