Systematic review and meta-analysis of bifrontal electroconvulsive therapy versus bilateral and unilateral electroconvulsive therapy in depression
- 18 November 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
- Vol. 13 (4), 248-258
- https://doi.org/10.3109/15622975.2011.615863
Abstract
Our aim was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing efficacy and side effects of bifrontal (BF) ECT to bitemporal (BT) or unilateral (RUL) ECT in depressionKeywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- The FTLD‐modified Clinical Dementia Rating scale is a reliable tool for defining disease severity in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration: evidence from a brain SPECT studyEuropean Journal of Neurology, 2010
- Methohexitone, propofol and etomidate in electroconvulsive therapy for depression: A naturalistic comparison studyJournal of Affective Disorders, 2009
- A Critical Examination of Bifrontal Electroconvulsive TherapyThe Journal of ECT, 2008
- Bifrontal Versus Bitemporal Electroconvulsive Therapy in Severe Manic PatientsThe Journal of ECT, 2008
- Clinical efficacy and cognitive side effects of bifrontal versus right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy (ECT): A short-term randomised controlled trial in pharmaco-resistant major depressionJournal of Affective Disorders, 2007
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial With 6-Month Follow-Up of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroconvulsive Therapy for Severe DepressionAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2007
- Electroconvulsive therapy – state of the artThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2003
- Comparison of Bifrontal and Bitemporal ECT for Major DepressionAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2000
- Seizure threshold in bilateral and unilateral ECTThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1995
- “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinicianJournal of Psychiatric Research, 1975