the “death” macguffin redux: comments on best
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Deviant Behavior
- Vol. 25 (5), 493-509
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620490441317
Abstract
In commenting on my critique of the “deviance is dead” thesis ( Goode, 2003 Goode, Erich . 2003. “The MacGuffin that Refuses to Die: An Investigation into the Condition of the Sociology of Deviance.”. Deviant Behavior, 24: 507–33. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar] ), Joel Best (in this issue) makes several points which seem shaky. Examined critically–and agreeing that the field has declined during the past 20 years in creativity and influence on sociology generally–the sociology of deviance is far from “dead.” In fact, as indicated by a number of measures, its health is as robust as ever. Here, I grapple with the conundrum of why the “death” myth is so widely accepted among sociologists. It is possible that the field's political incorrectness may provide an explanation to this mystery.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- the macguffin that refuses to die: an investigation into the condition of the sociology of devianceDeviant Behavior, 2003
- Does the death of the sociology of deviance claim make sense?The American Sociologist, 2002
- Is deviance “Deadℍ? The decline of a sociological research specializationThe American Sociologist, 2001
- White-Collar Crime and Criminal CareersPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2001
- Random ViolencePublished by University of California Press ,1999
- “I Hate my Voice”: Coming to Terms with Minor Bodily StigmasThe Sociological Quarterly, 1998
- WOMEN AND HEROINGender & Society, 1995
- Crimes of the Middle ClassesPublished by Yale University Press ,1991
- HOT SPOTS OF PREDATORY CRIME: ROUTINE ACTIVITIES AND THE CRIMINOLOGY OF PLACE*Criminology, 1989
- The Poverty of the Sociology of Deviance: Nuts, Sluts, and PrevertsSocial Problems, 1972