Quantification of the minimal luminal cross-sectional area after coronary stenting by two-and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound versus edge detection and videodensitometry
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 78 (5), 520-525
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00356-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mechanism of high-speed rotational atherectomy and adjunctive balloon angioplasty revisited by quantitative coronary angiography: Edge detection versus videodensitometryAmerican Heart Journal, 1995
- Three dimensional reconstruction of cross sectional intracoronary ultrasound: clinical or research tool?Heart, 1995
- Intracoronary Stenting Without Anticoagulation Accomplished With Intravascular Ultrasound GuidanceCirculation, 1995
- Benefit of intracoronary ultrasound in the deployment of Palmaz-Schatz stentsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- A Comparison of Balloon-Expandable-Stent Implantation with Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Edge detection versus densitometry in the quantitative assessment of stenosis phantoms: An in vivo comparison in porcine coronary arteriesAmerican Heart Journal, 1992
- Edge detection versus videodensitometry for quantitative angiographic assessment of directional coronary atherectomyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- Quantitative coronary arteriographic methods in the interventional catheterization laboratory: An update and perspectiveJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Edge detection versus densitometry for assessing coronary stenting quantitativelyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: Diameter versus densitometric area measurementsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984