Evaluation and comparison of two prognostic scores and the physicians’ estimate of survival in terminally ill patients
Open Access
- 21 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Supportive Care in Cancer
- Vol. 18 (1), 43-49
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0628-0
Abstract
Most terminally ill patients request information about their remaining life span. Professionals are not generally willing to provide prognosis on survival, even though they are expected to be able to do so from their clinical experience. This study aims to find out whether the standardized instruments Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI) and the Palliative Prognostic Score (PaP-S) are appropriate, specific, and sensitive to estimate survival time in patients receiving inpatient palliative care in Germany. PPI and PaP-S were assessed in addition to the core documentation data set of the Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation for patients admitted to the palliative care units in Aachen, Bonn, and Cologne. Time of survival was assessed with repeated phone calls to the family and was defined as the difference between the day of completion of the instruments (excluded) and the day of death (included). Survival time was compared with physicians’ estimations and prognostic scores in 83 patients. Whereas the estimates of the PPI and the PaP-S correlate highly, even higher correlations are found for the physicians’ prognosis and the scores. Correlations between survival time and the prognostic scores or physicians’ prognosis were lower. Physicians’ estimations overestimated survival time on average fourfold. Estimations were more often correct for very good and very bad prognosis. The prognostic scores are not able to produce a precise reliable prognosis for the individual patient. Nevertheless, they can be used for ethical decision making and team discussions. Estimating survival time from clinical experience seems to be easier for very bad or very good prognosis for physicians.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Palliative Medicine Review: PrognosticationJournal of Palliative Medicine, 2008
- Prognosticating: The End of a SeriesJournal of Palliative Medicine, 2008
- Survival Prediction in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients by Clinical Estimates, Laboratory Tests, and Self-Rated Anxiety and DepressionJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Individual survival time prediction using statistical modelsJournal of Medical Ethics, 2005
- Communicating With Realism and Hope: Incurable Cancer Patients' Views on the Disclosure of PrognosisJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Diagnostic Accuracy of the Palliative Prognostic Score in Hospitalized Patients With Advanced CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Antibiotika in der Palliativmedizin: Ergebnisse einer FokusgruppeZeitschrift für Palliativmedizin, 2004
- Truth may hurt but deceit hurts more: communication in palliative carePalliative Medicine, 2002
- Extent and determinants of error in doctors' prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study Commentary: Why do doctors overestimate? Commentary: Prognoses should be based on proved indices not intuitionBMJ, 2000
- A New Palliative Prognostic ScoreJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1999