Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier BV in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
- Vol. 15 (3), 273-280
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2006.09.001
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Health-Related Quality of Life in Total Hip and Total Knee ArthroplastyThe Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2004
- Outcomes Evaluation in OrthopaedicsThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2001
- Understanding the Relevance of Measured Change Through Studies of ResponsivenessSpine, 2000
- Superior responsiveness of the pain and function sections of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) as compared to the Lequesne-algofunctional Index in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremitiesOsteoarthritis and Cartilage, 1999
- QUALITY-OF-LIFE IMPROVEMENT COMPARED AFTER HIP AND KNEE REPLACEMENTThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1996
- SF 36 health survey questionnaire: II. Responsiveness to changes in health status in four common clinical conditions.Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1994
- The Swedish knee arthroplasty register: A nation-wide study of 30,003 knees 1976-1992Acta Orthopaedica, 1994
- Patient Outcomes Following Tricompartmental Total Knee ReplacementJAMA, 1994
- Measuring Health-Related Quality of LifeAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1993
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992