Theory-driven process evaluation of a complementary feeding trial in four countries.
Open Access
- 7 January 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Health Education Research
- Vol. 29 (2), 297-305
- https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyt115
Abstract
We conducted a theory-driven process evaluation of a cluster randomized controlled trial comparing two types of complementary feeding (meat versus fortified cereal) on infant growth in Guatemala, Pakistan, Zambia and the Democratic Republic of Congo. We examined process evaluation indicators for the entire study cohort (N = 1236) using chi-square tests to examine differences between treatment groups. We administered exit interviews to 219 caregivers and 45 intervention staff to explore why caregivers may or may not have performed suggested infant feeding behaviors. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between caregiver scores and infant linear growth velocity. As message recall increased, irrespective of treatment group, linear growth velocity increased when controlling for other factors (P < 0.05), emphasizing the importance of study messages. Our detailed process evaluation revealed few differences between treatment groups, giving us confidence that the main trial’s lack of effect to reverse the progression of stunting cannot be explained by differences between groups or inconsistencies in protocol implementation. These findings add to an emerging body of literature suggesting limited impact on stunting of interventions initiated during the period of complementary feeding in impoverished environments. The early onset and steady progression support the provision of earlier and comprehensive interventions.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized controlled trial of meat compared with multimicronutrient-fortified cereal in infants and toddlers with high stunting rates in diverse settingsThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2012
- Promoting Healthy Growth: What Are the Priorities for Research and Action?Advances in Nutrition: An International Review Journal, 2012
- Complementary feeding: a Global Network cluster randomized controlled trialBMC Pediatrics, 2011
- Evaluating Nurses' Implementation of an Infant-Feeding Counseling Protocol for HIV-Infected Mothers: The Ban Study in Lilongwe, MalawiAIDS Education and Prevention, 2009
- Systematic review of the efficacy and effectiveness of complementary feeding interventions in developing countriesMaternal & Child Nutrition, 2008
- What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survivalThe Lancet, 2008
- Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequencesThe Lancet, 2008
- Implementation examined in a health center-delivered, educational intervention that improved infant growth in Trujillo, Peru: successes and challengesHealth Education Research, 2006
- WHO estimates of the causes of death in childrenThe Lancet, 2005
- The theory of planned behaviorOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991