Need for Quality Improvement in Renal Systematic Reviews
- 1 July 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Vol. 3 (4), 1102-1114
- https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.04401007
Abstract
Background and objectives: Systematic reviews of clinical studies aim to compile best available evidence for various diagnosis and treatment options. This study assessed the methodologic quality of all systematic reviews relevant to the practice of nephrology published in 2005. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: We searched electronic databases (Medline, Embase, American College of Physicians Journal Club, Cochrane) and hand searched Cochrane renal group records. Clinical practice guidelines, case reports, narrative reviews, and pooled individual patient data meta-analyses were excluded. Methodologic quality was measured using a validated questionnaire (Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire). For reviews of randomized trials, we also evaluated adherence to recommended reporting guidelines (Quality of Reporting of Meta-Analyses). Results: Ninety renal systematic reviews were published in year 2005, 60 of which focused on therapy. Many systematic reviews (54%) had major methodologic flaws. The most common review flaws were failure to assess the methodologic quality of included primary studies and failure to minimize bias in study inclusion. Only 2% of reviews of randomized trials fully adhered to reporting guidelines. A minority of journals (four of 48) endorsed adherence to consensus guidelines for review reporting, and these journals published systematic reviews of higher methodologic quality (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The majority of systematic reviews had major methodologic flaws. The majority of journals do not endorse consensus guidelines for review reporting in their instructions to authors; however, journals that recommended such adherence published systemic reviews of higher methodologic quality.This publication has 109 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of Protein:Creatinine Ratio Measurements on Random Urine Samples for Prediction of Significant Proteinuria: A Systematic ReviewClinical Chemistry, 2005
- Dose-reducing H2 receptor antagonists in the presence of low glomerular filtration rate: a systematic review of the evidenceNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2005
- Exercise Training in Patients Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review of Clinical TrialsAmerican Journal of Nephrology, 2005
- Psycho-educational strategies to promote fluid adherence in adult hemodialysis patients: a review of intervention studiesInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2005
- Post‐Transplant Diabetes Mellitus and HCV Seropositive Status After Renal Transplantation: Meta‐Analysis of Clinical StudiesAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2005
- Systematic Review of Combined Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition and Angiotensin Receptor Blockade in HypertensionHypertension, 2005
- Epoetin alfa's effect on left ventricular hypertrophy and subsequent mortalityInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Hepatitis C Virus Antibody Status and Survival After Renal Transplantation: Meta-Analysis of Observational StudiesAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2005
- Prevalence of anemia and effects on mortality in patients with heart failureAmerican Heart Journal, 2005
- N‐acetylcysteine prophylaxis significantly reduces the risk of radiocontrast‐induced nephropathy: Comprehensive meta‐analysisCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2005