The relationship between measures of patient satisfaction and enablement and professional assessments of consultation competence
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Medical Teacher
- Vol. 26 (3), 223-228
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590410001683186
Abstract
The authors examined the extent of the relationship between a Consultation satisfaction questionnaire and Patient enablement instrument scores and professionally assessed consultation competence scores of senior medical students. Three analyses were performed: (i) linear regression with mean overall competence score as response variable; (ii) sensitivity and specificity calculations using patient scores to classify competence; (iii) a repeated measures model with consultation-specific competence score as response variable. One hundred and nineteen students and 388 patients took part. Consultation satisfaction and enablement scores were weakly correlated with overall and consultation specific competence scores (correlation coefficient 0.16 to 0.44). ‘Satisfaction with professional care’ had a sensitivity of 0.68, specificity of 0.72 and positive and negative predictive values of 0.32 and 0.92 respectively. It is concluded that patient and professional assessments may complement, but do not replace, each other. Levels of patient satisfaction should not be used as proxy measures of the quality of consultation competence.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patients' global ratings of student competence. Unreliable contamination or gold standard?Medical Education, 2002
- Use of Professional Associate Ratings to Assess the Performance of Practicing Physicians: Past, Present, FutureAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 1999
- Use of Peer Ratings to Evaluate Physician PerformanceJAMA, 1993