Effect of Misreported Family History on Mendelian Mutation Prediction Models
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Biometrics
- Vol. 62 (2), 478-487
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00488.x
Abstract
Summary People with familial history of disease often consult with genetic counselors about their chance of carrying mutations that increase disease risk. To aid them, genetic counselors use Mendelian models that predict whether the person carries deleterious mutations based on their reported family history. Such models rely on accurate reporting of each member's diagnosis and age of diagnosis, but this information may be inaccurate. Commonly encountered errors in family history can significantly distort predictions, and thus can alter the clinical management of people undergoing counseling, screening, or genetic testing. We derive general results about the distortion in the carrier probability estimate caused by misreported diagnoses in relatives. We show that the Bayes factor that channels all family history information has a convenient and intuitive interpretation. We focus on the ratio of the carrier odds given correct diagnosis versus given misreported diagnosis to measure the impact of errors. We derive the general form of this ratio and approximate it in realistic cases. Misreported age of diagnosis usually causes less distortion than misreported diagnosis. This is the first systematic quantitative assessment of the effect of misreported family history on mutation prediction. We apply the results to the BRCAPRO model, which predicts the risk of carrying a mutation in the breast and ovarian cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- As Genetic Tests Move Into the Mainstream, Challenges Await for Doctors and PatientsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- BayesMendel: an R Environment for Mendelian Risk PredictionStatistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 2004
- Graphical Models for Genetic AnalysesStatistical Science, 2003
- Application of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models in Clinical PracticeJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Validation of family history data in cancer family registriesAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2003
- Risk Communication in Genetic Testing for Cancer SusceptibilityJNCI Monographs, 1999
- Determining Carrier Probabilities for Breast Cancer–Susceptibility Genes BRCA1 and BRCA2American Journal of Human Genetics, 1998
- Probability of Carrying a Mutation of Breast-Ovarian Cancer Gene BRCA1 Based on Family HistoryJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1997
- The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancerCancer, 1996
- The Application of Bayesian Methods in Genetic CounsellingHuman Heredity, 1969