Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them?
Top Cited Papers
- 22 August 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 24 (10), 1889-1897
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613481812
Abstract
How objective are forensic experts when they are retained by one of the opposing sides in an adversarial legal proceeding? Despite long-standing concerns from within the legal system, little is known about whether experts can provide opinions unbiased by the side that retained them. In this experiment, we paid 108 forensic psychologists and psychiatrists to review the same offender case files, but deceived some to believe that they were consulting for the defense and some to believe that they were consulting for the prosecution. Participants scored each offender on two commonly used, well-researched risk-assessment instruments. Those who believed they were working for the prosecution tended to assign higher risk scores to offenders, whereas those who believed they were working for the defense tended to assign lower risk scores to the same offenders; the effect sizes (d) ranged up to 0.85. The results provide strong evidence of an allegiance effect among some forensic experts in adversarial legal proceedings.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychopathy and the combination of psychopathy and sexual deviance as predictors of sexual recidivism: Meta-analytic findings using the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised.Psychological Assessment, 2013
- Do attitudes affect psychopathy scores evaluators assign to sexual offenders in Sexually Violent Predator proceedings?Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,2012
- Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretationScience & Justice, 2011
- Improving the Predictive Accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 With Older Sex OffendersSexual Abuse : a Journal of Research and Treatment, 2011
- The vision in "blind" justice: Expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognitionPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2010
- The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.Psychological Assessment, 2009
- The role and relevance of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in court: A case law survey of U.S. courts (1991-2004).Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2006
- Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales.Law and Human Behavior, 2000
- Suggestions for the clinical and forensic use of the hare psychopathy checklist-revised (PCL-R)International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 1994
- Historical and Practical Considerations regarding Expert TestimonyHarvard Law Review, 1901