Studies Comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for Assessment of Pain Intensity in Adults: A Systematic Literature Review
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 30 June 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
- Vol. 41 (6), 1073-1093
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- European Commission’s Sixth Framework Programme (LSHC-CT-2006-037777)
This publication has 75 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of numerical and verbal rating scales to measure pain exacerbations in patients with chronic cancer painHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2010
- Computer-Based Assessment of Symptoms and Mobility in Palliative Care: Feasibility and ChallengesJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2009
- Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instrumentsQuality of Life Research, 2009
- Extending Computer Technology to Hospice Research: Interactive Pentablet Measurement of Symptoms by Hospice Cancer Patients in Their HomesJournal of Palliative Medicine, 2009
- Comparison of different pain scoring systems in critically ill patients in a general ICUCritical Care, 2008
- Evaluation of the Iowa Pain Thermometer and Other Selected Pain Intensity Scales in Younger and Older Adult Cohorts Using Controlled Clinical Pain: A Preliminary StudyPain Medicine, 2007
- Can cancer patients assess the influence of pain on functions? A randomised, controlled study of the pain interference items in the Brief Pain InventoryBMC Palliative Care, 2007
- Cancer Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials. A Review of the Literature (1999–2002)Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2005
- Patient-controlled epidural diamorphine for post-operative pain: verbal rating and visual analogue assessments of painEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology, 1996
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986