Multislice CT Angiography in the Follow-up of Fenestrated Endovascular Grafts:Effect of Slice Thickness on 2D and 3D Visualization of the Fenestration Stents
- 1 August 2008
- journal article
- Published by International Society of Endovascular Specialists in Journal of Endovascular Therapy
- Vol. 15 (4), 417-426
- https://doi.org/10.1583/08-2432.1
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the effect of multislice computed tomography (CT) protocols on the visualization of target vessel stents in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated with fenestrated endovascular grafts. Methods: Twenty-one patients (19 men; mean age 75 years, range 63–86) undergoing fenestrated endovascular repair of AAA were retrospectively studied. Multislice CT angiography was performed with several protocols, and the section thicknesses used in each were compared to identify any relationship between slice thickness and target vessel stents visualized on 2-dimensional (2D) axial, multiplanar reformatted (MPR), and 3-dimensional (3D) virtual intravascular endoscopy (VIE) images. Image quality was assessed based on the degree of artifacts and their effect on the ability to visualize the configuration, intra-aortic location, and intraluminal appearance of the target vessel stents and measure their protrusion into the aortic lumen. Results: There were 7 different multislice CT scanning protocols employed in the 21 patients (25 datasets, with 2 sets of follow-up images in 4 patients). The slice thicknesses and numbers (n) of studies included were 0.5 (n=3), 0.625 (n=6), 1.0 (n=1), 1.25 (n=9), 2.5 (n=3), 3.0 (n=1), and 5.0 mm (n=2). Of these CT protocols, images (especially 2D/3D reconstructions) acquired at 2.5, 3.0, and 5.0 mm were significantly compromised by interference from artifacts. Images acquired with a slice thickness of 1.0 or 1.25 mm were scored equal to or lower than those acquired with a submillimeter section thickness (0.5 or 0.625 mm), with minor degrees of artifacts resulting in acceptable image quality. Conclusion: Visualization of the target vessel stents depends on the appropriate selection of multislice CT scanning protocols. Our results showed that studies performed with a slice thickness of 1.0 or 1.25 mm produced similar image quality to those with a thickness of 0.5 or 0.625 mm. Submillimeter slices are not recommended in imaging patients treated with fenestrated stent-grafts, as they did not add additional information to the visualization.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- CT Virtual Intravascular Endoscopy in the Visualization of Fenestrated Stent-GraftsJournal of Endovascular Therapy, 2008
- Short to Midterm Outcomes of Fenestrated Endovascular Grafts in the Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms:A Systematic ReviewJournal of Endovascular Therapy, 2006
- Impact of the z-flying focal spot on resolution and artifact behavior for a 64-slice spiral CT scannerEuropean Radiology, 2006
- Multislice CT Virtual Intravascular Endoscopy for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Stent GraftsJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2004
- Diagnostic Value of CT Virtual Intravascular Endoscopy in Aortic Stent-GraftingJournal of Endovascular Therapy, 2004
- CT virtual intravascular endoscopy of abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with suprarenal endovascular stent grafting.Abdominal Radiology, 2003
- Fenestration in Endovascular Grafts for Aortic Aneurysm Repair: New Horizons for Preserving Blood Flow in Branch VesselsJournal of Endovascular Therapy, 2001
- Endoluminal Aortic Grafting with Renal and Superior Mesenteric Artery Incorporation by Graft FenestrationJournal of Endovascular Therapy, 2001
- Aorta and Iliac Arteries: Single versus Multiple Detector-Row Helical CT AngiographyRadiology, 2000
- A Fenestrated Covered Suprarenal Aortic StentEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 1999