The great mesh debate
- 10 June 2009
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in International Urogynecology Journal
- Vol. 20 (8), 889-891
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0927-5
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complications of vaginal mesh: our experienceInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2009
- Complication and Reoperation Rates After Apical Vaginal Prolapse Surgical RepairObstetrics & Gynecology, 2009
- Efficacy and safety of using mesh or grafts in surgery for anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse: systematic review and meta‐analysisBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2008
- A 5-year prospective follow-up study of vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapseInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2008
- Reoperation 10 years after surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinenceAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008
- Low-Weight Polypropylene Mesh for Anterior Vaginal Wall ProlapseObstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- EGGS for patient-centered outcomesInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2005
- Patient-selected goals: A new perspective on surgical outcomeAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2003
- Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinenceObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- A philosophy of pelvic surgery.1959