Concept Mapping as a Technique for Program Theory Development
- 1 September 2005
- journal article
- others
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Journal of Evaluation
- Vol. 26 (3), 389-401
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005278760
Abstract
The emergence of theory-driven evaluation has drawn attention to the need for practical ways for evaluators to construct program theory to achieve the benefits of the approach. This article illustrates the use of concept mapping as a technique to explicate underlying program theory in the context of family support programs. In this example, 29 professional staff members from a statewide family support program brainstormed 96 specific benefits for participant families. Fourteen direct service staff members sorted and rated the items and interpreted the map produced by multidimensional scaling analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis. Some of the benefits of the technique for evaluators conducting theory-driven evaluations are highlighted. These include helping evaluators decide what to measure, capturing the complexity of programs in the context of implementation, and managing good stakeholder-evaluator relations. The general limitations and issues of concept mapping as it applies to theory development are also discussed.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strategies for Managing Evaluation Anxiety: Toward a Psychology of Program EvaluationAmerican Journal of Evaluation, 2002
- Which links in which theories shall we evaluate?New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
- Using program theory to replicate successful programsNew Directions for Evaluation, 2000
- Theory-based evaluation: Gaining a shared understanding between school staff and evaluatorsNew Directions for Evaluation, 2000
- How Can Theory-Based Evaluation Make Greater Headway?Evaluation Review, 1997
- Personal Social Networks as a Focus of SupportPrevention in Human Services, 1991
- Linking program theory and social science theoryNew Directions for Program Evaluation, 1990
- Using program theory to describe and measure program qualityNew Directions for Program Evaluation, 1990
- A pattern-matching approach to link program theory and evaluation dataNew Directions for Program Evaluation, 1990
- Evaluability assessment: Developing program theoryNew Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987