What is the canonical theory of assimilation?
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- other
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences
- Vol. 40 (2), 149-163
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20013
Abstract
Throughout the past century, assimilation has been the hegemonic theory of ethnic group relations in sociology, and Robert E. Park is generally considered to be the key figure associated with the articulation of assimilation's canonical formulation. Based on a careful reading of Park's main essays on assimilation, this article argues that those who associate his position with the melting pot (with its assumption of the eradication of ethnic traits and ties), the race‐relations cycle, or a straight‐line process of incorporation misconstrue his views. This article is in part corrective and in part revisionist insofar as it is intended to indicate aspects of Park's theory that have particular relevance to current sociological efforts to understand the implications of assimilation in multiethnic liberal democracies.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Remaking the American MainstreamPublished by Harvard University Press ,2015
- Multiculturalism in a Global SocietyPublished by Wiley ,2002
- Assimilation of ImmigrantsPublished by Elsevier BV ,2001
- Revisting Assimilation: The Rise, Fall, and Reappraisal of a Concept in American Ethnic HistoryThe American Historical Review, 1995
- Is Assimilation Dead?The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1993
- The transplanted then and now: The reorientation of immigration studies from the Chicago School to the new social history1Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1990
- Quest for an American SociologyPublished by JSTOR ,1977
- Racial Assimilation in Secondary Groups With Particular Reference to the NegroAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1914
- Social Assimilation. IAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1901
- Assimilation of Nationalities in the United States. IPolitical Science Quarterly, 1894