Interobserver variation in prostate cancer Gleason scoring: Are there implications for the design of clinical trials and treatment strategies?
- 31 December 1997
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 9 (4), 222-225
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0936-6555(97)80005-2
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efforts to improve interobserver agreement in histopathological gradingJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- The prognostic importance of gleason grade in prostatic adenocarcinoma: A long-term follow-up study of 648 patients treated with radiation therapyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1995
- Correlation Between Visual Clues, Objective Architectural Features, and Interobserver Agreement in Prostate CancerAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1991
- Formula to Estimate Risk of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis from the Total Gleason Score for Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1988
- Problems in grading of prostatic carcinoma: interobserver reproducibility of five different grading systemsWorld Journal of Urology, 1986
- Grading Errors in Prostatic Needle Biopsies: Relation to the Accuracy of Tumor Grade in Predicting Pelvic Lymph Node MetastasesJournal of Urology, 1982
- Histologic grading study of prostate adenocarcinoma: The development of a new system and comparison with other methods—A preliminary studyCancer, 1982
- Assessing Inter-Rater Reliability for Rating Scales: Resolving some Basic IssuesThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1976
- Prediction of Prognosis for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma by Combined Histological Grading and Clinical StagingJournal of Urology, 1974
- Pathologic differentiation and prognosis of prostatic carcinomaJAMA, 1969