Experimental design and analysis and their reporting II: updated and simplified guidance for authors and peer reviewers
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 9 March 2018
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Pharmacology
- Vol. 175 (7), 987-993
- https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14153
Abstract
This article updates the guidance published in 2015 for authors submitting papers to British Journal of Pharmacology (Curtis et al., 2015) and is intended to provide the rubric for peer review. Thus, it is directed towards authors, reviewers and editors. Explanations for many of the requirements were outlined previously and are not restated here. The new guidelines are intended to replace those published previously. The guidelines have been simplified for ease of understanding by authors, to make it more straightforward for peer reviewers to check compliance and to facilitate the curation of the journal's efforts to improve standards.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Announcement: Transparency upgrade for Nature journalsNature, 2017
- Experimental design and analysis and their reporting: new guidance for publication in BJPBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 2015
- Implementing guidelines on reporting research using animals (ARRIVE etc.): new requirements for publication in BJPBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 2015
- BJP is changing its requirements for scientific papers to increase transparencyBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 2015
- Reproducibility in ScienceCirculation Research, 2015
- An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p -valuesRoyal Society Open Science, 2014
- Six red flags for suspect workNature, 2013
- Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the medianJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2013