To center or not to center? Investigating inertia with a multilevel autoregressive model
Open Access
- 6 January 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Psychology
- Vol. 5, 1492
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01492
Abstract
Whether level 1 predictors should be centered per cluster has received considerable attention in the multilevel literature. While most agree that there is no one preferred approach, it has also been argued that cluster mean centering is desirable when the within-cluster slope and the between-cluster slope are expected to deviate, and the main interest is in the within-cluster slope. However, we show in a series of simulations that if one has a multilevel autoregressive model in which the level 1 predictor is the lagged outcome variable (i.e., the outcome variable at the previous occasion), cluster mean centering will in general lead to a downward bias in the parameter estimate of the within-cluster slope (i.e., the autoregressive relationship). This is particularly relevant if the main question is whether there is on average an autoregressive effect. Nonetheless, we show that if the main interest is in estimating the effect of a level 2 predictor on the autoregressive parameter (i.e., a cross-level interaction), cluster mean centering should be preferred over other forms of centering. Hence, researchers should be clear on what is considered the main goal of their study, and base their choice of centering method on this when using a multilevel autoregressive model.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Simpson's paradox in psychological science: a practical guideFrontiers in Psychology, 2013
- Analyzing the Dynamics of Affective Dyadic Interactions Using Patterns of Intra- and Interindividual VariabilityMultivariate Behavioral Research, 2012
- The Disaggregation of Within-Person and Between-Person Effects in Longitudinal Models of ChangeAnnual Review of Psychology, 2011
- Psychosis reactivity to cannabis use in daily life: an experience sampling studyThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2010
- Emotional Inertia and Psychological MaladjustmentPsychological Science, 2010
- Ruminative self-focus and negative affect: An experience sampling study.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2008
- Depression and Next-day Spillover of Negative Mood and Depressive Cognitions Following Interpersonal StressCognitive Therapy and Research, 2007
- Diary Methods: Capturing Life as it is LivedAnnual Review of Psychology, 2003
- A framework for studying personality in the stress process.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995
- A framework for studying personality in the stress process.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995