The Comprehensive Care Team
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 12 January 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 164 (1), 83-91
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.164.1.83
Abstract
Background Little is known about the use of palliative care for outpatients who continue to pursue treatment of their underlying disease or whether outpatient palliative medicine consultation teams improve clinical outcomes. Methods We conducted a year-long controlled trial involving 50 intervention patients and 40 control patients in a general medicine outpatient clinic. Primary care physicians referred patients with advanced congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or cancer who had a prognosis ranging from 1 to 5 years. In the intervention group, the primary care physicians received multiple palliative care team consultations, and patients received advance care planning, psychosocial support, and family caregiver training. Clinical and health care utilization outcomes were assessed at 6 and 12 months. Results Groups were similar at baseline. Similar numbers of patients died during the study year (P = .63). After the intervention, intervention group patients had less dyspnea (P = .01) and anxiety (P = .05) and improved sleep quality (P = .05) and spiritual well-being (P = .007), but no change in pain (P = .41), depression (P = .28), quality of life (P = .43), or satisfaction with care (P = .26). Few patients received recommended analgesic or antidepressant medications. Intervention patients had decreased primary care (P = .03) and urgent care visits (P = .04) without an increase in emergency department visits, specialty clinic visits, hospitalizations, or number of days in the hospital. There were no differences in charges (P = .80). Conclusions Consultation by a palliative medicine team led to improved patient outcomes in dyspnea, anxiety, and spiritual well-being, but failed to improve pain or depression. Palliative care for seriously ill outpatients can be effective, but barriers to implementation must be explored.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors Considered Important at the End of Life by Patients, Family, Physicians, and Other Care ProvidersJAMA, 2000
- The Last Six Months of Life for Patients with Congestive Heart FailureJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2000
- Dying with Lung Cancer or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Insights from SUPPORTJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2000
- Evaluation of Prognostic Criteria for Determining Hospice Eligibility in Patients With Advanced Lung, Heart, or Liver DiseaseJAMA, 1999
- MediCaring: Development and Test Marketing of a Supportive Care Benefit for Older PeopleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1999
- The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Grant-making Strategies to Improve Care at the End of LifeJournal of Palliative Medicine, 1998
- A hospital-based comfort care team: Consultation for seriously ill and dying patientsAmerican Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, 1997
- Caring at the End of Our LivesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Survival of Medicare Patients after Enrollment in Hospice ProgramsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Separating Care and Cure: An Analysis of Historical and Contemporary Images of Nursing and MedicineJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1991