Corporate irresponsibility and corporate social responsibility: competing realities
- 31 July 2009
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Social Responsibility Journal
- Vol. 5 (3), 300-310
- https://doi.org/10.1108/17471110910977249
Abstract
Purpose – Building on the work of Carroll this article attempts to unravel, explore and explain corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a theoretical construct that has implications and consequences for corporate governance in particular, and more generally for the economy, business and society. It aims to extend Carroll's work on definitional constructs by re-examining some of the theoretical frameworks that underpin, inform and guide CSR. Design/methodology/approach – Carroll identified different levels, or a pyramid, of CSR and these are outlined and the advantages and disadvantages of a pyramid, levels-based approach discussed. The main contributions of this article lies is in its exploration of corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) as a concept in contrast to CSR. Bowd, Jones and Tench's CSI-CSR model is described, explained, analysed and used as a conceptual tool to make the theoretical move from a pyramid or level-based approach to a more dynamic framework of analysis. Findings – The proposition that CSI is better suited to a shareholder business model and CSR sits more comfortably with a stakeholder business model is examined. It is contested that people often wrongly equate CSR with irresponsible corporate actions. The CSI-CSR model establishes a theoretical framework around which grounded empirical research can be undertaken, applied and on which it can be reported. Research limitations/implications – This is a new area of research that addresses a gap in the literature and puts forward innovative theoretical models. Discussing the concept of irresponsibility makes for an interesting theoretical move. It questions the idea that corporations and business per se are always or necessarily socially responsible. Originality/value – In looking at and developing existing theoretical models, concepts and frameworks and exploring their merits, shortcomings and limitations, the article will be of interest and relevance to the business and academic communities. If there is such a thing as CSR then the implication is that there is such a thing as CSI and it is on this issue that this article seeks to promote and stimulate discussion.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ten principles of corporate citizenshipSocial Responsibility Journal, 2008
- Corporate social responsibility, new activism and public relationsSocial Responsibility Journal, 2008
- “Thou Shalt not be Good Enough”: (Mis)understanding CSRSocial Responsibility Journal, 2007
- Reporting CSR – what and how to say it?Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 2007
- Communicating corporate social responsibility: an exploratory case study of a major UK retail centreJournal of Public Affairs, 2006
- Reflections upon the responsive approach to corporate social responsibilityBusiness Ethics: A European Review, 2005
- Integration of information about corporate social performanceCorporate Communications: An International Journal, 2005
- The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and ImplicationsAcademy of Management Review, 1995
- The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and ImplicationsAcademy of Management Review, 1995
- A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate PerformanceAcademy of Management Review, 1979