Quality Gaps and Comparative Effectiveness in Lung Cancer Staging and Diagnosis
- 1 February 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Chest
- Vol. 145 (2), 331-345
- https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.13-1599
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pathologic Lymph Node Staging Practice and Stage-Predicted Survival After Resection of Lung CancerThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2011
- Quality of surgical resection for nonsmall cell lung cancer in a US metropolitan areaCancer, 2010
- Initial evaluation of the nonsmall cell lung cancer patient: diagnosis and stagingCurrent Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, 2010
- Early stage and locally advanced (non-metastatic) non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-upAnnals Of Oncology, 2010
- Multi-Modality Mediastinal Staging for Lung Cancer Among Medicare BeneficiariesJournal of Thoracic Oncology, 2009
- Diagnosis of Mediastinal Adenopathy—Real-Time Endobronchial Ultrasound Guided Needle Aspiration versus MediastinoscopyJournal of Thoracic Oncology, 2008
- ESTS guidelines for preoperative lymph node staging for non-small cell lung cancerEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2007
- Patterns of Surgical Care of Lung Cancer PatientsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2005
- Bronchoscopy in North AmericaJournal of Bronchology, 2000
- The Will Rogers PhenomenonNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985