Addressing resistance to antibiotics in systematic reviews of antibiotic interventions
Open Access
- 10 May 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Vol. 71 (9), 2367-2369
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkw135
Abstract
Antibiotics are among the most important interventions in healthcare. Resistance of bacteria to antibiotics threatens the effectiveness of treatment. Systematic reviews of antibiotic treatments often do not address resistance to antibiotics even when data are available in the original studies. This omission creates a skewed view, which emphasizes short-term efficacy and ignores the long-term consequences to the patient and other people. We offer a framework for addressing antibiotic resistance in systematic reviews. We suggest that the data on background resistance in the original trials should be reported and taken into account when interpreting results. Data on emergence of resistance (whether in the body reservoirs or in the bacteria causing infection) are important outcomes. Emergence of resistance should be taken into account when interpreting the evidence on antibiotic treatment in randomized controlled trials or systematic reviews.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Decontamination of the Oropharynx and Intestinal Tract on Antibiotic Resistance in ICUsJAMA, 2014
- Single versus combination intravenous antibiotic therapy for people with cystic fibrosisPublished by Wiley ,2014
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of antibiotic consumption on antibiotic resistanceBMC Infectious Diseases, 2014
- A Randomized Trial of Two Coverage Targets for Mass Treatment with Azithromycin for TrachomaPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2013
- The true cost of antimicrobial resistanceBMJ, 2013
- Considering resistance in systematic reviews of antibiotic treatmentJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2003
- How do you choose antibiotic treatment? Commentary: Resist jumping to conclusions Commentary: A matter of good clinical practice Commentary: Honesty is the best policyBMJ, 1999