Developing, delivering and documenting rehabilitation in a multi-centre randomised controlled surgical trial
Open Access
- 1 December 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery in Bone & Joint Research
- Vol. 3 (12), 335-340
- https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.312.2000364
Abstract
Objectives A rigorous approach to developing, delivering and documenting rehabilitation within randomised controlled trials of surgical interventions is required to underpin the generation of reliable and usable evidence. This article describes the key processes used to ensure provision of good quality and comparable rehabilitation to all participants of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing surgery with conservative treatment of proximal humeral fractures in adults. Methods These processes included the development of a patient information leaflet on self-care during sling immobilisation, the development of a basic treatment physiotherapy protocol that received input and endorsement by specialist physiotherapists providing patient care, and establishing an expectation for the provision of home exercises. Specially designed forms were also developed to facilitate reliable reporting of the physiotherapy care that patients received. Results All three initiatives were successfully implemented, alongside the measures to optimise the documentation of physiotherapy. Thus, all participating sites that recruited patients provided the sling immobilisation leaflet, all adhered to the physiotherapy protocol and all provided home exercises. There was exemplary completion of the physiotherapy forms that often reflected a complex patient care pathway. These data demonstrated equal and high access to and implementation of physiotherapy between groups, including the performance of home exercises. Conclusion In order to increase the validity and relevance of the evidence from trials of surgical interventions and meet international reporting standards, careful attention to study design, conduct and reporting of the intrinsic rehabilitation components is required. The involvement of rehabilitation specialists is crucial to achieving this. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:335–40.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adultsPublished by Wiley ,2012
- Hemiarthroplasty for Humeral Four-part Fractures for Patients 65 Years and Older: A Randomized Controlled TrialClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2012
- The problem of the poor control arm in surgical randomized controlled trialsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2012
- Developing the Allied Health Professions Research Network: Building Research Capacity and CapabilityInternational Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 2012
- Protocol for the ProFHER (PROximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation) trial: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised controlled trial of surgical versus non-surgical treatment for proximal fracture of the humerus in adultsBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2009
- The UKUFF Trial and the NIHR Comprehensive Local Research NetworksShoulder & Elbow, 2009
- Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statementBMJ, 2008
- Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and ElaborationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2008
- The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate ImprovementAnnals of Surgery, 2006
- Pitfalls in research: insights from studies of treatment of distal radius fractures in adultsCurrent Orthopaedics, 2001