Political Obligation, Freedom and Feminism
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 86 (1), 179-188
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1964023
Abstract
How should feminist theorists approach the analysis of political obligation and freedom? In her article in the December 1989 issue of thisReview, Nancy Hirschmann proposed a fundamental reconstruction of these concepts. Carole Pateman agrees that liberal obligation theory inadequately treats the coercion of women and other groups under the guise of voluntary obligations. But she argues that Hirschmann goes too far, particularly in rejecting the priority of freedom. Hirschmann explicates their disagreements and her approach.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Questions Concerning the Law of NaturePublished by Cornell University Press ,2008
- Rethinking Obligation: A Feminist Method for Political Theory.The Philosophical Review, 1994
- Rethinking ObligationPublished by Cornell University Press ,1992
- Feminism and Liberal TheoryAmerican Political Science Review, 1991
- Configurations of MasculinityPublished by Cornell University Press ,1991
- Democratic Voluntarism & the Problem of Justifying Political BondsPolity, 1990
- Feminism, the Individual, and Contract TheoryThe Sexual Contract.Carole PatemanEthics, 1990
- Freedom, Recognition, and Obligation: A Feminist Approach to Political TheoryAmerican Political Science Review, 1989
- Masculinity as ideology in political theory: Hobbesian man consideredWomen's Studies International Forum, 1983
- The Reproduction of MotheringPublished by University of California Press ,1978