Environmental standardization: cure or cause of poor reproducibility in animal experiments?
Top Cited Papers
- 30 March 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Nature Methods
- Vol. 6 (4), 257-261
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1312
Abstract
It is widely believed that environmental standardization is the best way to guarantee reproducible results in animal experiments. However, mounting evidence indicates that even subtle differences in laboratory or test conditions can lead to conflicting test outcomes. Because experimental treatments may interact with environmental conditions, experiments conducted under highly standardized conditions may reveal local 'truths' with little external validity. We review this hypothesis here and present a proof of principle based on data from a multilaboratory study on behavioral differences between inbred mouse strains. Our findings suggest that environmental standardization is a cause of, rather than a cure for, poor reproducibility of experimental outcomes. Environmental standardization can contribute to spurious and conflicting findings in the literature and unnecessary animal use. This conclusion calls for research into practicable and effective ways of systematic environmental heterogenization to attenuate these scientific, economic and ethical costs.This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reliability, robustness, and reproducibility in mouse behavioral phenotyping: a cross-laboratory studyPhysiological Genomics, 2008
- Knockout Mice: Is It Just Genetics? Effect of Enriched Housing on Fibulin-4+/− MicePLOS ONE, 2007
- Stability of inbred mouse strain differences in behavior and brain size between laboratories and across decadesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006
- Genetic and Environmental Effects on Complex Traits in MiceGenetics, 2006
- Common variations in the pretest environment influence genotypic comparisons in models of anxietyGenes, Brain and Behavior, 2005
- Dissecting complex behaviours in the post-genomic eraTrends in Neurosciences, 2004
- Experimental Localism and External ValidityPhilosophy of Science, 2003
- Different data from different labs: Lessons from studies of gene–environment interactionJournal of Neurobiology, 2002
- Genetics of Mouse Behavior: Interactions with Laboratory EnvironmentScience, 1999
- Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings.Psychological Bulletin, 1957