Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 16 November 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Medicine
- Vol. 14 (11), e1002447
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002447
Abstract
The use of core outcome sets (COS) ensures that researchers measure and report those outcomes that are most likely to be relevant to users of their research. Several hundred COS projects have been systematically identified to date, but there has been no formal quality assessment of these studies. The Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development (COS-STAD) project aimed to identify minimum standards for the design of a COS study agreed upon by an international group, while other specific guidance exists for the final reporting of COS development studies (Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting [COS-STAR]). An international group of experienced COS developers, methodologists, journal editors, potential users of COS (clinical trialists, systematic reviewers, and clinical guideline developers), and patient representatives produced the COS-STAD recommendations to help improve the quality of COS development and support the assessment of whether a COS had been developed using a reasonable approach. An open survey of experts generated an initial list of items, which was refined by a 2-round Delphi survey involving nearly 250 participants representing key stakeholder groups. Participants assigned importance ratings for each item using a 1–9 scale. Consensus that an item should be included in the set of minimum standards was defined as at least 70% of the voting participants from each stakeholder group providing a score between 7 and 9. The Delphi survey was followed by a consensus discussion with the study management group representing multiple stakeholder groups. COS-STAD contains 11 minimum standards that are the minimum design recommendations for all COS development projects. The recommendations focus on 3 key domains: the scope, the stakeholders, and the consensus process. The COS-STAD project has established 11 minimum standards to be followed by COS developers when planning their projects and by users when deciding whether a COS has been developed using reasonable methods.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR StatementPLoS Medicine, 2016
- How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guidelineTrials, 2016
- Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User SurveyPLOS ONE, 2016
- The Importance of Integration of Stakeholder Views in Core Outcome Set Development: Otitis Media with Effusion in Children with Cleft PalatePLOS ONE, 2015
- Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic ReviewPLOS ONE, 2014
- Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to considerTrials, 2012
- Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in childhood asthma: a survey of clinicians, parents, and young peopleTrials, 2012
- Asthma outcomes workshop: OverviewJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2012
- An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Asthma Control and ExacerbationsAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2009
- The asthma health outcome indicators studyAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 1996