Environmental Impact Assessment Regulation in Hong Kong and Shanghai: A Cross-city Analysis
- 1 May 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
- Vol. 42 (3), 355-374
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09640569911136
Abstract
Cross-city analysis in environmental regulation within non-democratic political systems is a neglected area. Taking policy convergence and styles of regulation as the focus, this paper has taken an initial step to compare the environmental impact assessment (EIA) regulation in Hong Kong and Shanghai. In this comparative exercise, it is identified that policy convergence occurs more explicitly in policy ideology and policy consequences, whereas divergence takes place in policy content, regulatory process and public consultation. Convergence, however, is only superficial whereas divergence is substantial. Indeed EIA systems of these two jurisdictions have displayed contrasting styles of regulation. The formal EIA system in Shanghai is dominated by the environmental agency, which regulates informal politics in the EIA process within a legal format. The informal EIA system in Hong Kong is co-ordinated by the environmental agency, which seeks active co-operation with the clients in a consultative EIA process in an informal and discretionary manner. What makes the Hong Kong system superior to the Shanghai system is the existence of institutional channels for public consultation. Within a non-democratic political setting, the EIA process in Hong Kong is more transparent and the EIA system is more accountable to the public, whereas the EIA process in Shanghai is lacking in transparency and the EIA system is under tight bureaucratic control.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Institutional Constraints on Environmental Management in Urban China: Environmental Impact Assessment in Guangzhou and ShanghaiThe China Quarterly, 1997
- The political economy of EIA in GuangzhouEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review, 1997
- ENVIRONMENTAL ADMINISTRATION IN SIX EUROPEAN STATES: SECULAR CONVERGENCE OR NATIONAL DISTINCTIVENESS?Public Administration, 1996
- Institutional contexts of environmental management: Water pollution control in Guangzhou, ChinaPublic Administration and Development, 1994
- The European Community Between Social Policy and Social RegulationJCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 1993
- National Diversity, Regime Competition and Institutional Deadlock: Problems in Forming a European Industrial Relations SystemJournal of Public Policy, 1992
- Comparing Comparative Policy Studies — A Path Towards Integration?Journal of Public Policy, 1992
- Policy Style and Issue Environment: The Electricity Supply Sector in West GermanyJournal of Public Policy, 1990
- Technology, Political Structure, and Social Regulation: A Cross-National AnalysisComparative Politics, 1986
- National Styles and Policy Sectors: Explaining Structured VariationJournal of Public Policy, 1985