High‐Reliability Health Care: Getting There from Here
Open Access
- 13 September 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Milbank Quarterly
- Vol. 91 (3), 459-490
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12023
Abstract
Context Despite serious and widespread efforts to improve the quality of health care, many patients still suffer preventable harm every day. Hospitals find improvement difficult to sustain, and they suffer “project fatigue” because so many problems need attention. No hospitals or health systems have achieved consistent excellence throughout their institutions. High‐reliability science is the study of organizations in industries like commercial aviation and nuclear power that operate under hazardous conditions while maintaining safety levels that are far better than those of health care. Adapting and applying the lessons of this science to health care offer the promise of enabling hospitals to reach levels of quality and safety that are comparable to those of the best high‐reliability organizations. Methods We combined the Joint Commission's knowledge of health care organizations with knowledge from the published literature and from experts in high‐reliability industries and leading safety scholars outside health care. We developed a conceptual and practical framework for assessing hospitals’ readiness for and progress toward high reliability. By iterative testing with hospital leaders, we refined the framework and, for each of its fourteen components, defined stages of maturity through which we believe hospitals must pass to reach high reliability. Findings We discovered that the ways that high‐reliability organizations generate and maintain high levels of safety cannot be directly applied to today's hospitals. We defined a series of incremental changes that hospitals should undertake to progress toward high reliability. These changes involve the leadership's commitment to achieving zero patient harm, a fully functional culture of safety throughout the organization, and the widespread deployment of highly effective process improvement tools. Conclusions Hospitals can make substantial progress toward high reliability by undertaking several specific organizational change initiatives. Further research and practical experience will be necessary to determine the validity and effectiveness of this framework for high‐reliability health care.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Explaining Michigan: Developing an Ex Post Theory of a Quality Improvement ProgramThe Milbank Quarterly, 2011
- The Ongoing Quality Improvement Journey: Next Stop, High ReliabilityHealth Affairs, 2011
- Assessing the Evidence of Six Sigma and Lean in the Health Care IndustryQuality Management in Health Care, 2010
- Hospital Governance And The Quality Of CareHealth Affairs, 2010
- The unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry: Findings from a mixed methods explorationInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2009
- Coordinating Care — A Perilous Journey through the Health Care SystemThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Fair and Just Culture, Team Behavior, and Leadership Engagement: The Tools to Achieve High ReliabilityHealth Services Research, 2006
- Struggling to Invent High‐Reliability Organizations in Health Care Settings: Insights from the FieldHealth Services Research, 2006
- Improving The Quality Of Health Care: Who Will Lead?Health Affairs, 2001
- The Evolution of Crew Resource Management Training in Commercial AviationThe International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1999