How Sustainable is Democratic Innovation? Tracking Neighborhood Councils in Montevideo
Open Access
- 1 August 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Politics in Latin America
- Vol. 7 (2), 131-148
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802x1500700205
Abstract
Focusing on the relatively longstanding experience of neighborhood councils in the Uruguayan capital of Montevideo (1993–), this research note seeks to analyze how sustainable democratic innovation is and to explain subsequent results. Sustainability is assessed through the evolution of citizens’ participation in elections and through the number of candidates who apply to become neighborhood councilors. For both indicators, a consistent decline in the levels of participation over time is found. This is deemed to be a consequence of an institutional design that seriously limits the performance of neighborhood councils in terms of their influence in the decision-making process and their acquisition of legitimacy and political capital.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Participatory Budgeting as if Emancipation MatteredPolitics & Society, 2014
- Expanding Accountability through Participatory Institutions: Mayors, Citizens, and Budgeting in Three Brazilian MunicipalitiesLatin American Politics and Society, 2004
- The Fragile Flower of Local Democracy: a Case Study of Decentralization/Participation in MontevideoPolitics & Society, 2002
- Participation and Democratic TheoryPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1970