On-line individual differences in statistical learning predict language processing
Open Access
- 1 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Psychology
- Vol. 1, 1618
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00031
Abstract
Considerable individual differences in language ability exist among normally developing children and adults. Whereas past research have attributed such differences to variations in verbal working memory or experience with language, we test the hypothesis that individual differences in statistical learning may be associated with differential language performance. We employ a novel paradigm for studying statistical learning on-line, combining a serial-reaction time task with artificial grammar learning. This task offers insights into both the timecourse of and individual differences in statistical learning. Experiment 1 charts the micro-level trajectory for statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies and provides an on-line index of individual differences therein. In Experiment 2, these differences are then shown to predict variations in participants’ on-line processing of long-distance dependencies involving center-embedded relative clauses. The findings suggest that individual differences in the ability to learn from experience through statistical learning may contribute to variations in linguistic performance.This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Category induction via distributional analysis: Evidence from a serial reaction time taskJournal of Memory and Language, 2010
- Sequential Expectations: The Role of Prediction‐Based Learning in LanguageTopics in Cognitive Science, 2010
- Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehensionCognitive Psychology, 2008
- Implicit learning of predictive relationships in three-element visual sequences by young and old adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2008
- Individual differences in working memory capacity and learning: Evidence from the serial reaction time taskMemory & Cognition, 2005
- Variability and Detection of Invariant StructurePsychological Science, 2002
- Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996).Psychological Review, 2002
- Infant artificial language learning and language acquisitionTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2000
- A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory.Psychological Review, 1992
- On the development of procedural knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1989