Quality and equality in British PhD assessment
- 1 June 2003
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Quality Assurance in Education
- Vol. 11 (2), 64-72
- https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880310471489
Abstract
This paper asks whether doctoral assessment has escaped the regulation of quality assurance procedures. Raising questions about the affective and micropolitical dimensions of an oral examination conducted in private, it explores how current concerns about quality assurance, standards, benchmarks and performance indicators in higher education apply to the assessment of doctoral/research degrees in Britain, and in particular to the viva voce examination. Successful PhD completion is a key performance indicator for universities and an important basis for the accreditation of their staff. Despite the rise of new managerialism, a general preoccupation with calculable standards and outcomes and an emphasis on student entitlements, transparency of decision making and information for “consumers”, there still seems to be considerable variation, and some mystification, in how doctoral assessment is conducted and experienced. The massification of doctoral studies and the doubling in number of institutions awarding their own doctorates, post-1992, are both likely to increase product variety still further.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Subjected to review: engendering quality and power in higher educationJournal of Education Policy, 2001
- The PhD and the Autonomous Self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogyStudies in Higher Education, 2000
- Doctoral Students' Access to Research Cultures-are some more unequal than others?Studies in Higher Education, 2000
- Examining the Doctorate: Institutional policy and the PhD examination process in BritainStudies in Higher Education, 2000
- What Does it Mean to be an Academic? A ColloquiumTeaching in Higher Education, 1998
- Creating a Delicate Balance: the doctoral supervisor's dilemmasTeaching in Higher Education, 1998
- Examining the examiners: An analysis of examiners' reports on doctoral thesesStudies in Higher Education, 1997
- Assessing Learners in Higher EducationBritish Journal of Educational Studies, 1995
- Effective Teaching in Higher EducationBritish Journal of Educational Studies, 1989
- Gender and British Postgraduate Funding Policy: a critique of the Winfield ReportGender and Education, 1989