Processed and Unprocessed Red Meat and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: Analysis by Tumor Location and Modification by Time
Open Access
- 25 August 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 10 (8), e0135959
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135959
Abstract
Although the association between red meat consumption and colorectal cancer (CRC) is well established, the association across subsites of the colon and rectum remains uncertain, as does time of consumption in relation to cancer development. As these relationships are key for understanding the pathogenesis of CRC, they were examined in two large cohorts with repeated dietary measures over time, the Nurses’ Health Study (n = 87,108 women, 1980–2010) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (n = 47,389 men, 1986–2010). Cox proportional hazards regression models generated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), which were pooled by random-effects meta-analysis. In combined cohorts, there were 2,731 CRC cases (1,151 proximal colon, 816 distal colon, and 589 rectum). In pooled analyses, processed red meat was positively associated with CRC risk (per 1 serving/day increase: HR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01–1.32; P for trend 0.03) and particularly with distal colon cancer (per 1 serving/day increase; HR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.09–1.69; P for trend 0.006). Recent consumption of processed meat (within the past 4 years) was not associated with distal cancer. Unprocessed red meat was inversely associated with risk of distal colon cancer and a weak non-significant positive association between unprocessed red meat and proximal cancer was observed (per 1 serving/day increase: distal HR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.68–0.82; P for trend P for trend 0.22). Thus, in these two large cohorts of US health professionals, processed meat intake was positively associated with risk of CRC, particularly distal cancer, with little evidence that higher intake of unprocessed red meat substantially increased risk of CRC. Future studies, particularly those with sufficient sample size to assess associations by subsites across the colon are needed to confirm these findings and elucidate potentially distinct mechanisms underlying the relationship between processed meat and subtypes of unprocessed red meat with CRC.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meat-Related Compounds and Colorectal Cancer Risk by Anatomical SubsiteNutrition and Cancer, 2013
- Associations of Red Meat, Fat, and Protein Intake With Distal Colorectal Cancer RiskNutrition and Cancer, 2010
- Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008International Journal of Cancer, 2010
- Childhood and adolescent energy restriction and subsequent colorectal cancer risk: results from the Netherlands Cohort StudyInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- Cumulative Risk of Colon Cancer up to Age 70 Years by Risk Factor Status Using Data From the Nurses' Health StudyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2009
- A Comparison of Colon and Rectal Somatic DNA AlterationsDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2009
- Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer: A Review of Epidemiologic and Experimental EvidenceNutrition and Cancer, 2008
- Are there two sides to colorectal cancer?International Journal of Cancer, 2002
- Flexible regression models with cubic splinesStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986